{"id":248,"date":"2012-07-10T21:41:48","date_gmt":"2012-07-10T20:41:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/?p=248"},"modified":"2012-07-10T21:41:48","modified_gmt":"2012-07-10T20:41:48","slug":"reasons-to-support-same-sex-marriage-the-short-version","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/2012\/07\/reasons-to-support-same-sex-marriage-the-short-version\/","title":{"rendered":"Reasons to support same-sex marriage &#8211; the short version!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m quite pleased with <a href=\"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/q\/gay-marriage\">my blog post about why legalising same-sex marriage is the only logical option<\/a>. It took me ages to finish, and I think it&#8217;s quite thorough. But at over three thousand words long, it&#8217;s not exactly bite-sized!<\/p>\n<p>So here I present its boiled down essence, in the form of an imaginary dialog (( and using my favourite under-used HTML element, the definition list <tt>8)<\/tt> )). It follows the same order as <a href=\"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/q\/gay-marriage\">the original post<\/a>, so if you want the details on any of these points, please look <a href=\"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/q\/gay-marriage\">over there<\/a> before arguing with them.<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<h2>The Arguments<\/h2>\n<dl>\n<dt>Marriage is about providing a stable environment to bring up a family.<\/dt>\n<dd>In that case, we&#8217;d better ban marriage between couples who are celibate, infertile, or just happily childless.<\/dd>\n<dt>An opposite-sex marriage benefits from the complementarity of the sexes.<\/dt>\n<dd>I&#8217;m sure some do, but is that really the most fundamental thing which makes for a successful marriage?<\/dd>\n<dt>Parliament has never tried to enact a definition of marriage before.<\/dt>\n<dd>Just because they never have, doesn&#8217;t mean they never can; just like they could define &#8220;theft&#8221; in the 1960s.<\/dd>\n<dt>Wouldn&#8217;t the UK be breaking with international agreement on the definition of marriage?<\/dt>\n<dd>The UK would be joining Argentina, Belguim, Canada, Iceland, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, South Africa, Spain, and Sweden, who have already introduced same-sex marriages. The American and French presidents support similar moves.<\/dd>\n<dt>But there&#8217;s a universally accepted basic definition of marriage, right?<\/dt>\n<dd>Well&#8230; apart from the historical and geographical technicalities, such as polygamy, dowries, arranged marriages, wildly divergent views of divorce&#8230;<\/dd>\n<dt>Is this another move to disestablish the Church of England?<\/dt>\n<dd>Marriages held in a registry office are already explicitly prohibited from including any religious element, so<br \/>\nthe battle to keep all marriages Christian was lost long ago.<\/dd>\n<dt>This will open the door to other kinds of marriage, like incest&#8230;<\/dt>\n<dd>Hm, there&#8217;s some <a href=\"http:\/\/h2g2.com\/dna\/h2g2\/classic\/F135418?thread=8256156\">interesting discussions<\/a> to be had there (if you don&#8217;t panic).<\/dd>\n<dt>&#8230;or polygamy&#8230;<\/dt>\n<dd>Yeah, that&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/h2g2.com\/dna\/h2g2\/classic\/F19585?thread=8294516\">another interesting idea<\/a>. Although <a href=\"http:\/\/qntm.org\/gay\">it could get a little complicated<\/a>.<\/dd>\n<dt>&#8230;or marrying your dog!<\/dt>\n<dd>OK, now you&#8217;re taking it too far; dogs can&#8217;t even voluntarily enter a legal contract!<\/dd>\n<dt><a href=\"http:\/\/www.anglican-mainstream.net\/2012\/06\/11\/lisa-nolland-letter-to-my-mp-on-my-opposition-to-gay-marriage\/\">Legalising gay marriage would to teenagers being taught about eating shit as a sexual fetish<\/a>!<\/dt>\n<dd>Wait &#8230; <strong>what!?<\/strong> Is this some kind of satire? Have I been <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/media\/mind-your-language\/2012\/apr\/19\/trolls-where-come-from\">trolled<\/a>?<\/dd>\n<dt>Same-sex relationships are just <em>different<\/em> to marriages, so Civil Partnerships are the right answer.<\/dt>\n<dd>Marriages between 20-year-olds are pretty different to marriages between 80-year-olds. How many different labels do we need?<\/dd>\n<dt>But what&#8217;s the big deal? A Civil Partnership is the same as a marriage, just, well, not a marriage!<\/dt>\n<dd>If it is equal, it is a marriage; if it is not a marriage, it is not equal.<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<h2>Who Opposes It?<\/h2>\n<p>Obviously these are dangerously generalised, but I think there are four kinds of people arguing against gay marriage:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Homophobes<\/strong> &#8211; think that homosexuality is just plain wrong<\/li>\n<li><strong>Homosceptics<\/strong> &#8211; don&#8217;t believe that homosexuality is as &#8220;real&#8221; or &#8220;valid&#8221; as heterosexuality<\/li>\n<li><strong>Homo<abbr title=\"not in my back yard\">nimby<\/abbr>ists<\/strong> &#8211; fine with homosexuality, as long as it\u2019s Over There Somewhere<\/li>\n<li><strong>Homodiscombobulated<\/strong> (( I couldn&#8217;t think of a good word for this one. But &#8220;discombobulated&#8221; is such a great word, right? )) &#8211; just find it all a bit icky, and frankly get a bit confused<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<h2>The End<\/h2>\n<p>(OK, just over 500 words. That&#8217;s as short as you&#8217;re going to get folks!)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m quite pleased with my blog post about why legalising same-sex marriage is the only logical option. It took me ages to finish, and I think it&#8217;s quite thorough. But at over three thousand words long, it&#8217;s not exactly bite-sized! So here I present its boiled down essence, in the form of an imaginary dialog [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[158,159,162,6,160,80,164,161,163,165,166],"class_list":["post-248","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-gay","tag-gay-marriage","tag-homosexuality","tag-law","tag-marriage","tag-politics","tag-relationships","tag-same-sex-marriage","tag-sexuality","tag-shortened","tag-summary","post-preview"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=248"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":256,"href":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/248\/revisions\/256"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=248"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=248"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=248"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}