{"id":172,"date":"2011-04-09T16:52:21","date_gmt":"2011-04-09T15:52:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/?p=172"},"modified":"2011-04-09T17:08:16","modified_gmt":"2011-04-09T16:08:16","slug":"dissecting-a-no2av-cartoon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/2011\/04\/dissecting-a-no2av-cartoon\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;A Permanent Cleggocracy&#8221; &#8211; Or Not: Dissecting an Anti-AV Cartoon"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This week, the first campaign leaflets started coming through for the Borough Council Elections, and, more interestingly, the voting system referendum. One of the Conservative &#8220;newsletters&#8221; featured this eye-catching cartoon, headlined &#8220;A.V. = A Permanent Cleggocracy&#8221;. I was immediately sceptical, but the more I looked at it, the more I realised how utterly wrong this cartoon is.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/media\/blog\/cleggocracy-full.jpeg\"><img decoding=\"async\" style=\"padding: 0;\" title=\"Source: intouch with Old Town Ward, Eastbourne Conservative Party; click for larger image\" src=\"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/media\/blog\/cleggocracy-overview.jpeg\" alt=\"A.V. = A Permanent Cleggocracy cartoon from Conservative Election leaflet\" \/><\/a><br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<h2>Cleggocracy<\/h2>\n<p>Firstly, let&#8217;s summarise this cartoon: &#8220;Cleggocracy&#8221; is depicted as a Frankenstein&#8217;s monster, with Cameron, Milliband, and someone I don&#8217;t recognise in the pocket of a giant Nick Clegg. The message is that if we say Yes to AV, you&#8217;ll get messy, unpopular, Lib Dem coalition governments; if we say No, our proud democratic traditions will survive, and next time we&#8217;ll be sensible and vote the Tories in properly. At least, I think that&#8217;s what it&#8217;s trying to say&#8230;<\/p>\n<h2>Student Fee Rises are Clegg&#8217;s Fault<\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright\" src=\"\/media\/blog\/cleggocracy-fees.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"103\" \/><br \/>\nThis is what first caught my eye: among the discarded sheets of paper (why are they discarded and torn anyway?) representing the policies the &#8220;Cleggocracy&#8221; of AV will bring in is &#8220;More Student Fees Rises&#8221;. So, according to this cartoon <strong>a strong Tory government would not have raised fees<\/strong> &#8211; that&#8217;s Clegg&#8217;s fault for forcing a coalition on them, and something we can expect more of under AV. Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but isn&#8217;t that <strong>exactly the opposite of true<\/strong>?<\/p>\n<h2>Parliamentary Democracy requires a Strong Government<\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright\" src=\"\/media\/blog\/cleggocracy-gravestone.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"204\" \/><br \/>\nThe next thing I found myself questioning was the gravestone, which is labelled &#8220;Parliamentary Democracy R.I.P. 2011&#8221;. Now, the rest of the cartoon appears to be arguing that what this country needs is a strong, Tory, government, and none of this namby-pamby coalition guff. So why is <em>Parliamentary<\/em> Democracy, which surely implies consensus and compromise, being mourned? Presumably, this has slipped in from a different cartoon, about the perils of electing a government by Proportional Representation &#8211; a very different question, and not one being asked by this referendum.<\/p>\n<h2>Ramsay Who?<\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright\" src=\"\/media\/blog\/cleggocracy-ramsay.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"200\" height=\"96\" \/><br \/>\nThe piece of paper that makes least sense to me is the one on the far right, which is headed &#8220;Ramsay MacDonald Supported AV, 1931 &#8211; THAT SAYS IT ALL!&#8221; Does it? Personally, I know nothing about Ramsay MacDonald, or the politics of 1931 &#8211; like most voters, I wasn&#8217;t born at the time &#8211; and I&#8217;m not sure I need or want to.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, the cheap tit for tat response would be &#8220;Nick Griffin Opposes AV &#8211; <em>That<\/em> Says It All!&#8221;. Oh, and Mussolini made the trains run on time. Sorry, what were we talking about again?<\/p>\n<h2>Loathed Lib Dems<\/h2>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright\" src=\"\/media\/blog\/cleggocracy-policy-book.jpeg\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"117\" \/><\/p>\n<p>The Nick Clegg monster in the cartoon is holding a book titled &#8220;Policies the British People Loathe&#8221; &#8211; clearly everyone reading the cartoon is assumed to vote Tory, and loathe the Lib Dems. This leaflet was distributed in Eastbourne, which has indeed <a title=\"Parliamentary results, nicely laid out on Wikipedia\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Eastbourne_(UK_Parliament_constituency)\">had Tory MPs for 98 of the last 100 years<\/a>; and the County Council is under Conservative control.<\/p>\n<p>But at the 2010 general election, <a title=\"BBC 2010 Election Coverage\" href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/nol\/shared\/election2010\/results\/constituency\/b56.stm\">the Lib Dem candidate took the seat, with 47% of the vote<\/a>. And the Borough Council ward of Old Town, to which this leaflet was targeted, is<a title=\"Eastbourne Borough Council - Old Town Ward\" href=\"http:\/\/www.eastbourne.gov.uk\/council\/councillors\/wards\/?Ward=6\"> currently represented entirely by Lib Dem councillors<\/a>, and has been even under Conservative majorities. So who exactly are the staunch Tory-supporting Lib Dem-loathing voters being targeted here?<\/p>\n<h2>Can you have a Positive No Campaign?<\/h2>\n<p>This cartoon may not be as disingenuous as the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newstatesman.com\/blogs\/steven-baxter\/2011\/02\/voting-system-baby-gets\">notorious &#8220;vote no or the baby gets it&#8221; posters<\/a>, but it doesn&#8217;t stand up to much scrutiny. In the software world, companies like Microsoft are often accused of using &#8220;FUD&#8221; to discredit their competitors &#8211; not outright lies, nothing that could easily be called libellous, but enough to spread Fear, Uncertainty, &amp; Doubt. Notably, FUD works best if you are trying to maintain the status quo, as people&#8217;s natural fear of change acts in your favour. But it does rather suggest a lack of confidence in your own advantages.<\/p>\n<p>So, philosophical question time: Is negative campaigning inevitable if you are campaigning for a No vote in a referendum?<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>PS: Somebody posted <a href=\"http:\/\/twitpic.com\/410ag5\">this cartoon of a filled-out AV ballot paper<\/a> on Twitter. It makes no sense, because <strong>you don&#8217;t have to rank every candidate<\/strong>. So in reality, it would look <a href=\"http:\/\/imm.io\/4OQK\">more like this (with and without AV)<\/a>. Either the person that made that cartoon didn&#8217;t understand how AV works, or it&#8217;s more FUD.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This week, the first campaign leaflets started coming through for the Borough Council Elections, and, more interestingly, the voting system referendum. One of the Conservative &#8220;newsletters&#8221; featured this eye-catching cartoon, headlined &#8220;A.V. = A Permanent Cleggocracy&#8221;. I was immediately sceptical, but the more I looked at it, the more I realised how utterly wrong this [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[133,88,131,132,83,130,80,82,128,129],"class_list":["post-172","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-alternative-vote","tag-av","tag-cartoon","tag-cleggocracy","tag-democracy","tag-fud","tag-politics","tag-voting","tag-voting-reform","tag-yes2av","post-preview"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/172","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=172"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/172\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":183,"href":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/172\/revisions\/183"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=172"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=172"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rwec.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=172"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}